Thursday, April 26, 2007

I think like intellectuals :-)

I think somewhere our thoughts meet or my thoughts are inspired by his. Read this article to know what i am saying.





powered by performancing firefox

Monday, April 23, 2007

The beginning...

For those of you who don't know me or hardly know me or don't know enough about me, I am getting married...soon.

I am going to start a series of post in which I will try to do what a good blogger should. Share. Share my experiences as I go through 'the process'. The thoughts that inhibit my mind. My dilemmas, frustrations and joys. This, I hope, will be a guiding light for the 'wanna bes', a nostalogical (this is my special creation) moment for the 'been there done thats' and we all will probably end up sharing.

So keep watching this space...





powered by performancing firefox

Saturday, April 14, 2007

Its not just me...its also her.

Asit bought a Bajaj Pulsar 180CC. I had a 2 km test sprint with her. She was what she was...a 180CC machine driven by a crazy road maniac. Right now I own a Bajaj Boxer 100CC city bike, so simple arithmetic for me was I could do twice the 'stuff' on this bike. But looks like bikes are like wine (or women!!!) they need to age a bit.

Asit's bike is too young to 'satisfy' me. She should be couple of 1000 kilometers old and then I will sprint her again.

She couldn't cross 70KmpH and the front was a bit wobbly. But the sprint made me realize one thing ... it's time!





powered by performancing firefox

Gopalism

Prof. Gopal taught me costing, M etc. at GIM. Am posting some of his one liners for the aam junta. (courtesy Swastik Rath)



  • Hitler did Genetic cleansing, and today genetic cleansing of brain is done by LIC if u say that insurance is a tax
    saving mechanism.

  • U can use a low quality tube light flickering all the time. But that wont look good in a hotel. But use the same tube light in a disco with a low quality coloured paper and a choke and u can cut a great deal of costs.

  • The way this discussion is going i feel like spraying pesticide on my face coz if i do it on someone else's face then there is no guarantee that someone else will not come up with something more stupid

  • "The government ought to charge entertainment tax for my lectures..."
  • "You go to the company's website, cut paste the intro page. Then you cut paste the company's balance sheet, and the competitor's balance sheet. Then you paste finance ministers photograph. And it becomes a case study."

  • In US if a person is found guilty of cheating he is punished.
In gulf countries, his fingers might be chopped off.

In India if a person cheats he is made the
member of parliament.



  • There are three things common for a person with marketing and finance background.. .

1. Money



2. Greed



3. Ignorance



  • "Octroi is an animal which is peculiar to some states only"
  • "Concept of tax paying is not the culture in Delhi"
  • "Lifebuoy is positioned as the complete bathing soap for you, your family and your buffalo. The volume of sales dropped when people found out that they could not wash their tractors with it."
  • "Don't kill me with such statements.. ..as is it my sugar is crossing levels"
  • On the viability of 5kg soap, "For larger SKU's rub the baby against the soap rather than the other way round"




powered by performancing firefox

Tuesday, April 03, 2007

Uttarardha - Shanivaar dopahar 2 baje

Sunday the 1st April'07, I had been to Telugu university, Nampally. Sutradhar was staging a couple of short plays starting 7 o'clock. On Saturday when I called Vinayji for inquiry, he told me that he had read my last post . That made me feel good for two reasons; one, people read what I write and two, Sutradhar takes feedback and acts on it. Now for the plays. I would give 90 of 100 for script selection. Good stuff. Let me give my opinion on these plays one by one:



Shanivar dopahar 2 baje :



This is the tale of an illegitimate extra-marital relationship between a man (not so happily married with a daughter) and an aging spinster. They seem to have lost it on the 'family' life front and have sex every Saturday afternoon at 2. The affair has been on for last 2 years. The play is nothing but another Saturday afternoon ordeal happening in front of the audience that gives us a glimpse of their lives.



The script is well written. At least the subject appealed to me. There are some lose moments. Like the one where the man mentions the female's brother sister. I couldn't quite get what both the characters (on stage) felt for these unseen characters. I only understood that the lady wasn't quite happy with her sister and wanted her to get married ASAP. There is also this moment where the man talks about his wife sending his daughter for collecting some 'design' and the child getting lost. It was clear that the families were a trouble for the on-stage characters. But the off stage characters did not get 'established'. May be that wasn't the intention at all. But in my opinion, the off-stage characters (their respective families) are the reason for the play. They should have been more prominent.



It was also sad that some incidents drew undue laughter in the play. Like the part where they are trying to hide themselves from the people outside. I think that is the exact agony of the relationship that should hurt the audience.



For the direction - 60/100. There were some places where the only two character seemed to crowd the spot. They seemed to spend a lot of time talking while standing. I found that odd. Also, may be the director could have spoken to the writer and made the families more prominent. The funny moments should have been fewer.



The music - If I am not wrong, It was Bhimsen Joshi. It was a good choice. The volume was a little distracting. I would have loved instrumental any day.



The set - We could have have done without the lamp. It was taking up the space for nothing.



The performance - To say that Vinay Verma was good will be an understatement. He uses physical and vocal expression to the best in the group. No body at Sutradhar sounds as good as him. And he was at ease there. The lady was also impressive. Not as much although. She made her mark with the small soliloquy - a wonderfully written, directed and delivered piece of theater. But energy and voice is something that needs efforts from the lady.



This play gets a 70/100 from me.





Uttaraardh :



The story of two writers. An older writer trying to write the 2nd half (Uttaraardh) to his previously published story. And a youg writer who has also failed to deliver anything for the magazine and hence given a notice by the magazine to complete the older writer's story. The younger writer's real life is very close or rather same as the story whose Uttaraardh remains to be written. Let me brief the reader about the incomplete story under discussion.

This is the story of a young dancer who is into a relationship with both father and son. Father, for the security he can provide and the position he holds. Son, for his youth and exuberance. But when the father and son come to know about this triangle, they decide to put an end to it.

Ratan tells the oldie, that since he is a part of the actual story, he can help him complete the story and thus write the Uttaraardh. But the story shall unfold in a role play where Ratan plays the father and oldie plays the son.

The dancer is to bring to glasses of sharbat with poison in one. No one other than her knows which glass is poisoned. Both would accept the glass and hence the decision would be known without saying and the alternative wuld be eliminated. However, the father knows that the girl will chose him. So he swaps the glass with his son's, to save his son. But the son sees it and swaps the glass back, thinking that his father is very mean and wants to save himself. Thus the son dies. The father can not bear the trauma and becomes hysterical.

While doing the role play, real poison is used which kills the oldie. The glass swapping incident is the incident that has changed the life of Ratan as his mother stays faithful to the hysterical father and ruins her life. When Ratan receives notice from the magazine, he intends killing himself but wants to relive the moment that the glass swapping incident was. He himself goes mad after the old writer is dead.



Well I tried but the story is really confusing. We could not get it till we spoke to the translators and I am still not sure I have got it right. Vinayji if you are reading this, correct me if I am wrong. Again, a great script. Hats off to the script selection.

Also, the direction was wonderful. The director tried to do full justice to the script and characters. There was pace, there were points that looked stressed like the climax under the red spot, or the first time oldie loses bearing in role play. It looked director's cut.

The music - I did not notice anything except the sound of thunder.

The lights - good use of yellow cross lighting and white generals to demarcate the two stories (like I have used colour above :-) ). But there were black spots in the centrestage. Also the characters in the first play were sitting in the centrestage hence the lights were adjusted for them. The second play used the same spotlights without readjustment. The actors were also taller. So the bodies were illuminated more than the faces. The set was good.

The performances - Feroze, the young lad impressed me. He looked real and at ease on stage. But what I thought was his strength, turned out to be his weakness when I saw the entire play. I would blame him for my not understanding the story. The character did not build up to the hysteria. When the oldie died Ratan looked more sad than hysterical. I couldn't quite get it. The senior actor was stiff. His dialogue delivery had a Marathi accent. Some words could not be understood. He made his character look very dramatical. There was also some problem in both artist's standing posture. While Feroze stooped and looked casual in his stance, it also hindered his expression, as light came from top. The elder gentleman did not 'face' the audience most of the time. We got to see his profile more than once. On a lighter note, both the actors could have been mixed together and we could have two fine actors in equal proportion.



Thats what is "my opinion" on the two plays. You differ? You agree? Put a comment.





powered by performancing firefox