Skip to main content

What (not) to expect from a politician

 

The photo has no real significance to the subject being discussed :-)

Off late, I have seen a lot of my friends venting their anguish against politicians. Many of them expected the politicians to behave more responsibly, discipline the public on dos & don'ts of COVID precautions, get national priorities right and basically change the society to which they belong and are elected representatives.

I think this bunch has wrong expectations from the wrong group of people. Here is why -

A politician's entire existence is centred around election victory. Winning an election is their Key Performance Indicator (KPI). A consistently losing politician who is not making any effort to come to power, is not even a politician. Acceptance from society, popularity and majoritarian view are the fundamental characteristics of a politician. They have to operate within the limits of these fundamentals to maintain their existence. Isn't that why we always refer to successful politicians as someone who 'knows the pulse of their people'? 

If we don't like what the politicians are doing, that means there is something fundamentally wrong with the society - at least the majority of it that these politicians care about. To expect the politicians will show mirror to the society & it's people, highlight their shortcomings, false beliefs is utopian. For a politician focussed on getting elected, going to a voter (or a group of it) and telling them that they are wrong, is a recipe for disaster.

To do that, you need an activist. Someone who will call a spade a spade. Someone, who will tell the world if there is something wrong - even at the cost of unpopular. In fact, being righteous is the KPI of an activist, not being popular. An activist will always tell the world what they may not want to hear. As activists work tirelessly to educate the society about right & wrong, eventually (sometimes) the majority swings in their favour. They start gathering crowds and form a popular opinion. At this point, they can chose to become politicians and get elected OR let a politician take advantage of the majoritarian view.

I hope with this, we have clear expectations from individuals based on their KPIs and stop whining.  


PS: a politician may pretend to be an activist but not the other way round. 

Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Community Supported Agriculture

Most products have the cost of failure built into the price of the product. For example, a film. When a film gets made, there are so many things at stake, that the all these risks are covered by the premium on the ticket. If a film ticket was prices simply by dividing the cost + profit by the number of people watching, it would be pretty cheap. Or consider for example, the price of a car. The insurance premium that the manufacturer pays is built into the cost of the car. Or say a doctor, who conducts very risky operations get paid highly...and now you ask what's the point?? The point is, this doesn't happen with a farmer.A farmer faces all the vagries of nature or monsoon. Alll his risks are unmeasurable and unpredictable. But does he get to decide his pricing? Why does market not behave perfectly when it comes to agriculture? Why doesn't the theory of high risk - high return apply to agriculture? How does a farmer hedge his risks then is the main question! The answer as I ...
4 comments
Read more

|| Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh ||

What we are today is a function of our environment through our past. Our parents, teachers, relatives, neighbours are our key influencers. One such influencer in my life and in the life of millions in this country is Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh or the RSS. This organization established in 1925 has a very interesting history . Established with a aim of nation building, the initiative had no trace of fundamentalism in it. Started with a clear cut nationalistic view, and on time tested values of ‘simple living-high thinking’, the organization spread like a wild fire. Then happened, what was destined to, for an organization that was all-inclusive, had no political representation or was based on non-sensational issues (like religion, cast or region). What RSS is today (or is perceived to be) is certainly not what it was (or is) meant to be. I, as an individual, strongly believe in the RSS, its motives, its structure and its values. I feel being a part of the Sangha and consider myse...
4 comments
Read more

Why people break rules

This is a topic I have been thinking over for some time. It is disheartening to see that breaking rule is becoming a norm across our country. As per a recent news article that is what even the government is observing. We dont need anybody's statement to testify this as we see it all around us. This post is an attempt at understanding why the law of the land is broken? Let us first try to understand why laws or rules are brought into place. A rule is an attempt to make the playing field level. It identifies a set of criteria based on which decisions will be taken in a system. Forming a queue is the simplest form of rule. It identifies first come first serve basis for serving a person, no parking zones are meant to be kept free for free traffic flow so on an so forth. Becauase rules are more like cartels . The member who deviates has an incentive to do so than what he would achieve by staying in the cartel. There are certain market conditions in which cartels work. I will not get in...
4 comments
Read more