Skip to main content

Why Lead India wont work

All of us must be well aware of the Lead India campaign started by the Times Of India group. Yet a brief overview in their own words.
I think this is just another talent hunt program and is not going to help India politics or democracy in any way. The very reach of this program is limited to literate English speaking class of Indians. That could be hardly 10% of the total voting population. The real aam aadmi who decides the governments and hence the policies that govern us is far from basic primary education, leave alone English newspaper or television medium. As I have written in my earlier post real politics will still be nothing but manipulating numbers. As atanu says in his post here, untill basic education is given to each and every Indian citizen, it is stupid to expect rational thinking and unbiased opinion from him/her.
All that this contest will do is provide limelight to a bunch of opportunistic small time socialites, bring dinner table discussion on national television and increase the revenue of mobile companies through premium priced SMS and call services.

Comments

Kiran said…
Hi Musafir,

Back to blogosphere so soon?? :P

Anyways .. I agree with your opinion here. When the campaign first started I saw it as something worthwhile. I thought TOI really wants to do something for the country. But, in the end its just a way of increasing revenue through premium voting services.

However, there's no denying the fact that it does provide a platform for atleast the educated middle-class Indians to pitch in to politics. Its a wake up call for that class of Indians which is least interested in politics.. (and which may also have the least turn-out percentage at the polls.. if you know what I mean).

Its upto us to take the positives from the Times Lead India campaign.. it may not end up as TOI envisaged (or painted).. but it has played its role in motivating several educated middle class Indians.

What say?
thelaukik said…
KKKKKiran,
I am coming from a totally different direction here. What TOI is doing is more like adjusting the headlights when the engine is seized. The engine of Indian Democracy is the uneducated, underprivileged rural Indian. He is the number that makes our governement. What is TOI achieving (other than profits) by 'motivating' the educated. You think the educated dont know the value of their votes? If they dont, they ain't no educated. They are merely the headlights, essential but not cenessary for the country to run as it is running now.
My point is 'educate every freaking Indian born'. Or at least try to. The politicians will never want to do that because then they cant manipulate the lives of the numbers and come to power.
coolvyakti said…
Lead India is a good initiative - to try and highlight the critical need of able leadership in India. It is pretty evident that our political process has failed in identifying, grooming or mentoring the kind of leadership that we need in India, to step outside our “shell” of the “developing nation” or a “third world country”.

However, I am very concerned about the overall approach of making a “tamasha” out of this whole process of identifying leadership.

Is this something in our culture, to make a competition out of everything?

Why do we want to know who is the “best” leader in the “times of india - lead india contest”? OK so after a lot of tamasha they will declare one leader to be the “best” - so what? How does it help solve our intractable problems?

Do you think Gandhiji would have even qualified within your top 25 - by your metrics?

Why is it that you feel today’s leadership needs to be “glib” or “smooth” when answering questions posed by so called judges?

We need people who can act..we have enough who can “talk”…if you need the ones that can talk, go to the nearest political party.

And I believe the top “leaders” will get a budget of 50 lacs or a 100 lacs to implement their pet project!

Wow, and do you know the Govt’s budget for the social sector alone is 64000 crores?

So you expect that a paltry 50 or 100 lacs will make a dent, when 64000 crores does not budge the social indices of India?

Sorry to say, but unless TOI can justify the reason to make this into a tamasha, their overall motives seem suspect. It looks more like building buzz and furthering their brand identity by spending few hundred lacs…and actually getting a lot more via advertisement revenues and SMS charges, from Indians who get duped by this scheme.

Ultimately the poor Indians, the malnutrished Indians, the suicidal farmers, will stay where they are, while tamasha goes on…and a few leaders bask in the glow and get one more line to add in their resume.
thelaukik said…
@ Coolvyakti
agree to the T...
Kaustubh said…
hi laukik...
i found on ajay dongre's blog! ev1 i blog...and i have kicked off with cycling...did u start?
visit me at
http://mindinrhymes.blogspot.com/

Popular posts from this blog

Why people break rules

This is a topic I have been thinking over for some time. It is disheartening to see that breaking rule is becoming a norm across our country. As per a recent news article that is what even the government is observing. We dont need anybody's statement to testify this as we see it all around us. This post is an attempt at understanding why the law of the land is broken? Let us first try to understand why laws or rules are brought into place. A rule is an attempt to make the playing field level. It identifies a set of criteria based on which decisions will be taken in a system. Forming a queue is the simplest form of rule. It identifies first come first serve basis for serving a person, no parking zones are meant to be kept free for free traffic flow so on an so forth. Becauase rules are more like cartels . The member who deviates has an incentive to do so than what he would achieve by staying in the cartel. There are certain market conditions in which cartels work. I will not get in...

The oscar for dilemmas

As I was travelling from Goa to Pune in a Bus, I overheard some conversation and could see a lot of dilemma on the face of a fellow passenger. As the story evolved, I could connect with him. Thus it went: They were a couple, he was with his fiance/wife/girlfriend (a non-ma/behen relationship). There was another girl (pretty) who wanted to a lady's seat. She could get it only if this gentleman would give up the company of his travel mate as there were no other female passengers on the bus. I have been through similar situation and have said no and felt guilty about it till the society at large did something equally unjust to me. But this incident in the bus the other day, sparked off some more such dilemmas that I have come across quite often. I thought of having a golden globe of dilemmas; put them on the blog and see which is the most common dilemma. First being the one above, the second dilemma that comes to my mind is of cheating in exams. No No. Me cheating is taboo enough! It ...

Community Supported Agriculture

Most products have the cost of failure built into the price of the product. For example, a film. When a film gets made, there are so many things at stake, that the all these risks are covered by the premium on the ticket. If a film ticket was prices simply by dividing the cost + profit by the number of people watching, it would be pretty cheap. Or consider for example, the price of a car. The insurance premium that the manufacturer pays is built into the cost of the car. Or say a doctor, who conducts very risky operations get paid highly...and now you ask what's the point?? The point is, this doesn't happen with a farmer.A farmer faces all the vagries of nature or monsoon. Alll his risks are unmeasurable and unpredictable. But does he get to decide his pricing? Why does market not behave perfectly when it comes to agriculture? Why doesn't the theory of high risk - high return apply to agriculture? How does a farmer hedge his risks then is the main question! The answer as I ...