Skip to main content

The question to loners in AC Cars


Do you ever feel guilty? We all curse the polution, we all curse the traffic congestion and we all curse the rising fuel prices. But have you ever given a thought to the fact that you are the root cause for it? Because you think it is un dignified to take public transport. Because you think you are so busy and your time is so valuable that Car Pooling is a dumb idea. A car is for four, and you are underutilising it by travelling alone.



If any of a loner in a car is reading this, I challenge them to give me 5 logical and worthy reasons that  makes one chose a car for daily commute and not share it with anyone. Remember that these are the reasons you are chosing car over pollution, health & traffic congestion.


Comments

Kiran said…
Hi Laukik,

These are the exact questions I used to ask.. even as a kid. Whenever I used to see ppl travelling alone in a car, I used to dismiss them as "status" show-offs. How could they be so blind to environmental issues?

In fact, i was always of the opinion that car should be used only if the number of people is more than 2.

But, now that I am facing reality, I am having second thoughts. I am increasingly seeing car as the best way to commute.

Here are some reasons for using cars as personal transport:

1. Pathetic public transport system. If you have stayed in Mumbai or Chennai, probably you wont agree with this; but definitely Bangaloreans and Delhiites would vouch for it.

2. Safety. 2-wheelers are obviously dangerous, regardless of helmet or no helmet.

3. Rains. This is a safety issue as well as inconvenience (for example, consider a person who lugs around a laptop. so how does such a person face the rain?)

4. Distance of commute. In cities like the NCR where people commute huge distances for work everyday, 2-wheelers are impractical. And hey, did I mention that its not safe? :D

Of course there would be solutions to each of these points, albeit individually. I am also aware that by driving a car to work, I am doing something wrong from environmentand congestion point of view.

But when you put it all together and arrive at the big picture, somehow I begin to favor car for transport rather than 2-wheeler.

Unless.. unless there is some middle ground; as described here
Kiran said…
Laukik,

I completely missed the point about car-pooling in my previous comment!

Yes, I am definitely all for car-pooling. It is the most practical solution for all the problems you have mentioned. I re-iterate: I think the best solution would still be to provide better public transportation. But the most practical is car-pooling.

It only requires some more discipline on the part of individuals and little more respect for others' time. As of today, car-pooling might turn out to be a bit of a challenge. Let me give an example.

Suppose you are about to leave from office; your manager comes to you and requests you to stay for half an hour more for some not-so-urgent work. Now telling him "Sorry, I have to leave right now else I will miss the bus" is a hundred times more likely to work than "Sorry, I have to leave right now because the guys with whom I car-pool are waiting". The latter case will in all probability evoke a response like "Ask them to adjust for half-an-hour na".

This is a vague example, but you get the point.

And when I say public transport is best, I am including "office-provided transport" as public transport. The percentage of companies which provide bus or other means of transport needs to be increased; and employees need to be impressed upon about the advantages of using the company transport instead of their cars.

Take Bangalore again as an example. Just think how much the traffic problems would be solved if more companies provided bus transport; and majority of the employees started using this service.
Anonymous said…
I think its not only the question of dignity; the problem also lies in the public transport system; the frequency, no. of seats, keeping up time etc.... Ofcourse, car pooling is an option but what if u dont find anyone?

Popular posts from this blog

Community Supported Agriculture

Most products have the cost of failure built into the price of the product. For example, a film. When a film gets made, there are so many things at stake, that the all these risks are covered by the premium on the ticket. If a film ticket was prices simply by dividing the cost + profit by the number of people watching, it would be pretty cheap. Or consider for example, the price of a car. The insurance premium that the manufacturer pays is built into the cost of the car. Or say a doctor, who conducts very risky operations get paid highly...and now you ask what's the point?? The point is, this doesn't happen with a farmer.A farmer faces all the vagries of nature or monsoon. Alll his risks are unmeasurable and unpredictable. But does he get to decide his pricing? Why does market not behave perfectly when it comes to agriculture? Why doesn't the theory of high risk - high return apply to agriculture? How does a farmer hedge his risks then is the main question! The answer as I ...

|| Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh ||

What we are today is a function of our environment through our past. Our parents, teachers, relatives, neighbours are our key influencers. One such influencer in my life and in the life of millions in this country is Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh or the RSS. This organization established in 1925 has a very interesting history . Established with a aim of nation building, the initiative had no trace of fundamentalism in it. Started with a clear cut nationalistic view, and on time tested values of ‘simple living-high thinking’, the organization spread like a wild fire. Then happened, what was destined to, for an organization that was all-inclusive, had no political representation or was based on non-sensational issues (like religion, cast or region). What RSS is today (or is perceived to be) is certainly not what it was (or is) meant to be. I, as an individual, strongly believe in the RSS, its motives, its structure and its values. I feel being a part of the Sangha and consider myse...

Why people break rules

This is a topic I have been thinking over for some time. It is disheartening to see that breaking rule is becoming a norm across our country. As per a recent news article that is what even the government is observing. We dont need anybody's statement to testify this as we see it all around us. This post is an attempt at understanding why the law of the land is broken? Let us first try to understand why laws or rules are brought into place. A rule is an attempt to make the playing field level. It identifies a set of criteria based on which decisions will be taken in a system. Forming a queue is the simplest form of rule. It identifies first come first serve basis for serving a person, no parking zones are meant to be kept free for free traffic flow so on an so forth. Becauase rules are more like cartels . The member who deviates has an incentive to do so than what he would achieve by staying in the cartel. There are certain market conditions in which cartels work. I will not get in...